| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Zombiewalkin |
Re: Bracu-Who? | ||
|
cat got yer tongue?
|
|||
ECC |
Re: THE HANGING WOMAN by John Davidson, with Paul Nash. | ||
Quote: I've noticed that the Japanese source of NIGHT OF THE SORCERERS for Midnight's DVD has red lettering for the title sequence but the Unicorn tape has the credits in white lettering (same font). It seems strange that there would be two English language title sequences prepared. |
|||
Squonkamatic |
Re: THE HANGING WOMAN by John Davidson, with Paul Nash. | ||
|
I did just get one of the Unicorn tapes and it looks like the same print used for THE HANGING WOMAN but with a different title job. Nice box.
|
|||
ECC |
Re: RETURN OF THE ZOMBIS (Video Alsen; Greece) | ||
![]() This Greek PAL VHS of RETURN OF THE ZOMBIS sounds like it was sourced from the same material used for the Japanese release (I haven't seen it) without optical censoring. The titles are a tan color and fit in the frame (the Wizard version has white titles that are sometimes slightly cropped off at the sides). The print is far more colorful than the Wizard version. The Greek subs tend to lag behind the dialogue (like live closed-captioning). It features the expository scenes missing from the Wizard version but featured in the HANGING WOMAN cut. One line I don't remember hearing in the BEYOND THE LIVING DEAD version (its probably there but I haven't checked it) is the Mayor's line about rumors of "they say the dead hold orgies in that bloody cemetery." The gore is present but I'm not sure about "all" the nudity. I'll update this later because I'm too tired to search for my Wizard tape at the moment but other posts mention frontal nudity during the autopsy scene (fogged in the Japanese release, apparently). In the Greek tape, the sheet is only pulled down to the corpse's waist. The cover art for this release shows that Wizard did not come up with the misleading artwork for their release. While the nude woman is probably an original part of this artwork or recycled from something else, the three zombie heads can also be seen on an Italian release of LA CASA DEGLI ZOMBI (aka THE CHILD, an oddly atmospheric low-budget American production). |
|||
Squonkamatic |
Re: RETURN OF THE ZOMBIS (Video Alsen; Greece) | ||
|
93 minutes should be the complete runtime.
|
|||
Latarnia |
Re: RETURN OF THE ZOMBIS (Video Alsen; Greece) | ||
|
I'm not sure about that, Squonk. Is that the runtime of the Midnight version? I timed the Video Latino Spanish NTSC tape and it clocked in at a bit over 94 minutes. The Spanish Cultural Ministry lists the film at 99 minutes!
Mirek |
|||
ECC |
Re: RETURN OF THE ZOMBIS (Video Alsen; Greece) | ||
|
I'll time it and let you know. By the way, don't forget that it is a PAL tape so it may indeed time out to under 90 minutes. Is the Japanese release from an NTSC master or a PAL one?
I think that Wizard was given an uncut master, just not the same one as the one used for the Japanese and Greek sources (i.e paler color and white titles on the Wizard version). I love how you can see the sunlight shining down on the people through the trees in the early cemetery sequences despite the fact that it is supposed to be overcast and raining. |
|||
ECC |
Re: RETURN OF THE ZOMBIS (Video Alsen; Greece) | ||
|
1:34:08 is the running time I got off my VCR clock. This is a PAL tape but I'm not sure whether that is the PAL time or NTSC converted time through my Samsung VCR (which has an internal converter and allows you to pick the NTSC PAL or SECAM output).
One thing I did notice is that the film does not fade out at the end like the Wizard version. The Greek version waits until Doris and her horse-drawn wagon are almost out of the corner of the frame in the distance before cutting to black. There is a video generated THE END title but I didn't count that in my timing calculations. |
|||
Latarnia |
Re: RETURN OF THE ZOMBIS (Video Alsen; Greece) | ||
|
Squonk, check your Midnight DVD-R. The running time should be 94 minutes and 10 seconds. If you take out 5 seconds from Midnight's intro logo and another 5 seconds, at most, from "The End"--you'll get 94 minutes easily.
I quickly went through the Midnight DVD-R last night and, yes, the Japanese source seems to offer a complete cut of this film, with nudity, though there is pubic hair fogging in two scenes. I don't have the Greek video, but from what ECC reports, that version is complete, too. I do wonder about the very first shot of the film, with the doctor and the priest. It's too quick of a shot. One thing nice about the Spanish version is the end credit sequence, which follows right after Zurakowska leaves with the coffin containing her father. DeMasi's choral music continues throughout this sequence. In the Japanese presentation as seen on the Midnight disc, end credits are missing, not doubt, in part, because much of the credits are placed at the beginning of the film. Mirek |
|||
Squonkamatic |
Re: RETURN OF THE ZOMBIS (Video Alsen; Greece) | ||
|
94 minutes would be the correct runtime.
|
|||
Squonkamatic |
Re: RETURN OF THE ZOMBIS (Video Alsen; Greece) | ||
|
And that is INCLUDING the Teen Workout footage mentioned in the other thread.
|
|||
ECC |
Re: RETURN OF THE ZOMBIS (Video Alsen; Greece) | ||
|
That opening shot is rather abrupt, I wonder if a presentation credit might have appeared over the beginning of that shot in either the original Spanish version or the Italian version that was omitted from export versions.
Also, what is the content of the opening and closing credits in the Video Latino version? All of the major and minor technical credits as well as all of the actors are listed in the opening credits of RETURN. Also, who does Charles Quiney play in this film? I know he plays the Baron in Merino's other film BLOOD CASTLE but I just noticed that he's listed in the credits of RETURN (billed way down the list in this one). |
|||
Squonkamatic |
Re: RETURN OF THE ZOMBIS (Video Alsen; Greece) | ||
|
I think he is one of the soldiers guarding the cemetery. The word from Mirek and Bob Monel both is that there is no single definitive version of this film currently available on home video; MV's is closest to the described complete Spanish runtime, but remember that would be a covered version and would include scenes not shown in the English prints.
This is a funny movie, as in strangely evasive as a complete presentation. I gave up on finding one that would clock MV's out of sheer, utter frustration -- I think that like EL GRAN AMOR DEL CONDE DRACULA we are always going to be coming up short on this title unless a Spanish company like Manga or Divisa coughs up a restored version made from an archived Spanish print -- And even then one would presumably have to further restore it by substituting the uncoverd takes of the nude scenes to get what you're REALLY looking for here, which is unfogged pubes and all of the footage Merino shot. Don't take this wrong, but good luck :--D . There probably is a complete Spanish print somewhere, but like all of the other gems in the rough it probably is in private hands, filed somewhere that nobody is aware of, or otherwise removed from availability at this time for a company to restore it. I wish someone could: It's a crackerjack little horror thriller which deserves to be seen. The problem is that with all of the misleading, erroneous or unclear information abounding about the movie in it's various forms that, like myself, many people have sort of "given up" on it, and are content to allow it to remain as a mystery rather than drive ourselves spare. |
|||
Latarnia |
Re: RETURN OF THE ZOMBIS (Video Alsen; Greece) | ||
|
The Video Latino version has opening credits over the cemetery scene, and then further credits at the end of the movie. None are computer-generated, so they're part of the original print.
I'd have to check but I believe Quiney is the servant of the household, the guy who gets a thrashing from the Stan Cooper character and later gets turned into a zombie, or zombi. As far as a definitive version of this film, Midnight's (which is sourced from a Japanese video) is very close. There are two instances I've noticed of fogging of a femme's pubic region, and if any end credits appeared in the original print, they're absent here. I don't have the Greek video, but it appears close to the grail, too. Mirek |
|||
John P Charles |
Re: Bracu-Who? | ||
|
Pan-Canadian (which became Cineplex-Odeon in 1986) sub-distributed a handful of early Wizard titles in Canada. RETURN OF THE ZOMBIES was one, PHENOMENAL, CRIMSON, and ZOMBIE LAKE three others. They used the Wizard packaging and master, but stuck their own labels on the actual tapes. Pan-Canadian later licensed a bunch of their titles to VEC, and those versions came out in small boxes. Cineplex-Odeon must have put ZOMBIES and probably others out one more time on their own before their rights went south.
John Charles |
|||
ECC |
Re: Bracu-Who? | ||
|
I'm thinking the Italian version might represent the uncovered export version we're familiar with. The Divisa Spanish PAL tape might be covered but perhaps it or the Italian version might be more complete in terms of that opening shot, at least.
|
|||
Latarnia |
Re: Bracu-Who? | ||
|
I have an Italian variant and it's terribly cut, the beginning being particularly butchered.
Mirek |
|||
Squonkamatic |
THANK YOU JOHN CHARLES!! | ||
Quote: YOU, sir, just explained a lot. I have a bunch of these multiple releases, and will dump the re-issuings & keep the "pure" Wizard tapes. Unless the box is especially phat, that is. |
|||
Squonkamatic |
A Working "Cut Films" Lesson?? | ||
|
I was out & about the other day thinking about this film and a couple three others [DRACULA'S GREAT LOVE, SLAUGHTER HOTEL, NIGHT OF THE SEAGULLS & WEB OF THE SPIDER] that act as sort of a "lesson" or study in how films become cut, lost or otherwise inaccessible in their complete forms.
RETURN OF THE ZOMBIES/ORGY OF THE LIVING DEAD is particulary fascinating because of the sheer number of diminished re-releases. The IMDB has an impressive list of re-titlings: Orga de los muertos, La (Spain) Beyond the Living Dead Dracula the Terror of the Living Dead Hanging Woman (USA) (video box title) Orgia dei morti, La (Italy) Return of the Zombies Terror of the Living Dead (USA) The Hanging Woman The Orgy of the Dead Zombie 3: Return of the Living Dead And what is even more remarkable is that all of them are different, and NONE of them complete and/or definitive. As with my beloved WEB OF THE SPIDER, each release seems to have been re-interperated for different audiences in different parts of the world or at different times, even. While the reasons why this happens is pretty obvious, a tougher challenge [and what I think ECC is getting at] is tracking the cutting & diminishment BACKWARDS to find the one form that all of the others have as their common ancestor. It is a process similar to etymology or cladistics, scientific processes to find common ancestors for a given life form or verbal expression, respectively. The problem is that there really isn't a scientific method for tracing how cut films end up in their state, since [especially in RETURN OF THE ZOMBIES' case] there isn't a written or documented record on how many times video transfers were made, and if in fact there was one "grandfather" video transfer that they can all be traced back to. COUNT DRACULA'S GREAT LOVE is another excellent example because of the peculiarities of the one transfer we know of, which was done off-centered for some reason. No matter who's version you see, including the Dutch Sunrise Tapes version and the British VPD PAL tapes, they are ALL off-centered. Is this a peculiarity of how the English print was made? Common logic would have it that if the Dutch and the Brits were doing transfers of their own, we'd see one of them at least strike home with an on-center presentation. But the only version with truly correct framing are the DRACULA'S VIRGIN LOVERS tapes from Ivers Film Services, which show the film in it's original 1:85:1 LBX form, but is cut. Something Weird Video also has a cut version of DRACULA'S VIRGIN LOVERS which I am presuming that they reformatted for home video themselves, since nobody else has a fullframe version of that print and it does have the same title card as the Ivers prints. BUT, the transfer SWV used is from a *DIFFERENT* print than the Ivers tapes: It does not have the color loss noticeable especially right at the beginning, nor the buzzing screen noise & scratches. I would give good money to find the transfer technician & ask where they got the version from, and why they chose to do a fullframe transfer -- Unless the 16mm print they used was already prepared for 1:33 presentation. Now when considering RETURN OF THE ZOMBIES, it seems as though all of the surviving examples are fullframe transfers that were dead on: Nobody seems to have done one that is drastically different in outward appearence than anyone else's. AND YET NONE OF THEM IS THE SAME, unlike WEB OF THE SPIDER, where we see the same fullframe P&S'd transfer shown in English, Spanish, German and (maybe) French. Yet those transfers were all made from a very different print of the film than the Italian language version used by the Dutch & the Greeks. You can tell just by the surface noise projector marks during "control moments". There MAY be one complete master print that they all have in common, but if so nobody has prepared it for home video. The logical explanation is that different target markets got different versions of the film and that may be the case with RETURN OF THE ZOMBIES as well. There may not be a "definitive" version in the truest sense of the word, though like Mirek I personally feel that Midnigh Video's IS the most favorable & complete version available. The most fascinating consideration is, in my opinion again, that NONE of the other versions were derived from that transfer or the print it was generated from. Just how that particular version ended up in Japan remains unanswered, but it is a very different print than the one used to make, say, THE HANGING WOMAN, who's re-titling was done while still in the print stage. RETURN OF THE ZOMBIES appears to have been titled during the video transfer process, and yet the titles we see on MVs and the Wizard transfers are VERY very different in appearence, even if they contain identical information. This is a truly mysterious film, even more of a mystery than WEB OF THE SPIDER which simply seems to have been issued in different forms for different markets. RETURN OF THE ZOMBIES seems to have no direct lineage that one can trace from the present day home video versions back to a specific print. |
|||
John P Charles |
Re: THE HANGING WOMAN by John Davidson, with Paul Nash. | ||
|
Something Weird Video also has a cut version of DRACULA'S VIRGIN LOVERS which I am presuming that they reformatted for home video themselves, since nobody else has a fullframe version of that print and it does have the same title card as the Ivers prints. BUT, the transfer SWV used is from a *DIFFERENT* print than the Ivers tapes: It does not have the color loss noticeable especially right at the beginning, nor the buzzing screen noise & scratches. I would give good money to find the transfer technician & ask where they got the version from, and why they chose to do a fullframe transfer -- Unless the 16mm print they used was already prepared for 1:33 presentation.
Based on what I've seen of SWV tapes, they will letterbox a movie (though not necessarily at full ratio) if it was shot in hard matte 1.85:1 or scope. On open matte films, they opt to leave them at 1.33 and not add soft mattes. I can see the logic of the latter (why risk cropping out nudity and sex, which is what most SWV customers are buying their tapes for?), though it does sometimes result in very unbalanced compositions. My guess in regards to this film is that they were working from a pre-cropped 16mm source. John Charles |
|||